The phrase “duck and cover” is a bit of ancient history that may be meaningless to younger generations. It likely brings back a variety of memories for elementary school students in the United States in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. For me, yesterday’s post about the 75th anniversary of the Hiroshima atomic bomb recalled the dark days of the Cold War.
When the Soviet Union exploded an atomic bomb in 1949, it was a shock to the U.S. government and the population. In an attempt to calm an agitated public, the Federal Civil Defense Administration (FCDA) created a program to educate ordinary people about what they could do to protect themselves in the event of a nuclear attack.
The FCDA hired a New York City ad agency to create a film that could be shown in schools to educate children about how to protect themselves in the case of atomic attack. It was filmed at a school in Astoria, Queens, and featured Bert the Turtle and students and adults demonstrating recommended defensive techniques.
Here is the original 1951 film.
Asserting that people could protect themselves from a nuclear blast by hiding under their desks or a blanket at a picnic is a bit absurd. Still, the campaign provided some reassurances to a concerned public.

Schools held drills each year to the sound of air raid sirens. Classes marched to the basement and sat against the walls in the hall with hands over heads. Children were also taught that a nuclear bomb could explode with no warning. Upon seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion, school kids were supposed to react basically the same way as soldiers on a battlefield.
Dropping immediately and covering exposed skin provide[s] protection against blast and thermal effects … Immediately drop facedown. A log, a large rock, or any depression in the earth’s surface provides some protection. Close eyes. Protect exposed skin from heat by putting hands and arms under or near the body and keeping the helmet on. Remain facedown until the blast wave passes and debris stops falling. Stay calm, check for injury, check weapons and equipment damage, and prepare to continue the mission.
— US Army field manual FM 3–4 Chapter 4
Although a nuclear attack meant certain death or serious injury for most in the target area, there were some benefits to the drills. Covering exposed skin could prevent burns, and where I lived, the drills for a nuclear attack also doubled as practice for tornadoes.
Today, many are extremely concerned about the harmful effects of climate change, and rightly so. Those effects occur over a period of years or decades, and there are well understood ways to stop climate change or mitigate its effects.
During the Cold War, civilian populations carried on their daily lives with the threat of instantaneous annihilation always in the back of mind. We lived with terms like “mutually assured destruction.”
During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union were in an arms race to develop bigger and better nuclear devices in great numbers. U.S. nukes were smaller but more accurate. The Soviets specialized in weapons with massive destructive power. Its largest nuclear weapon, the Tsar Bomba, was tested in 1961. The explosion was more powerful than all of the bombs used in WWII combined and 1,400 times more powerful than the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs. Some joked that “close only counts in horseshoes and thermonuclear weapons.”
People were unsure if civilization would survive. In the event of a nuclear war, some of my high school friends made a pact in 1970 to meet at the summit of Pikes Peak on July 4, 2000. Even though there was no war, we actually met there as a sort of mini reunion.

Final Thoughts
Thank heavens we have never had to duck and cover because of a nuclear bomb. But the threat remains. Do you have memories of the “duck and cover” days?
Thankfully I do not have a “duck and cover” memory because over here, I wasn’t born before the Nigerian Civil War. But then, my parents have extensively spoken about these times, they had to duck at the sound of guns or explosives and stopped sleeping on their beds and used floor mats instead.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the U.S. duck and cover was always just a drill, thankfully. Also thankfully your parents made it through the war in Nigeria safely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! Thank goodness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great realisation
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the read and comment!
LikeLike
I have very vivid memories from the 60s. I think the air raid drills were officially stopped in the 80s and were being phased out in the 70s. Air raid drills and fire drills where classes marched outside and gathered on the playground or in front of the school where a nice diversion. Do they still do fire drills?
LikeLike
for some reason, I don’t remember ever actually doing such drills. today they should be practicing how to wear masks and stay six feet apart…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I attended elementary classes at a teacher’s college. Our school building was adjacent to the steam, plumbing and electrical tunnel that connected various buildings on the college campus. Whenever we had an air-raid drill, everyone scrambled down to the basement level and was ushered into the subterranean tunnel. This made perfect sense to us children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thinking back on these rills it is kind of amazing that they made perfect sense. I thought an attack was likely and that duck and cover would protect us. They were also a bit of fun.
LikeLike
I retired four years ago after teaching for thirty-one years in elementary school. We did “duck and cover” drills a few times each year. Most of these were because we live in California near an earthquake fault line. Most of the earthquakes in our area have historically been small, but one brought down a bridge while a car was on it, and some houses came off their foundations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a good point. Duck and cover drills worked for earthquakes too. Along with fire drills, the air raid drills were kind of fun because they provided a break in the routine. Did teachers receive civil , defense training?
LikeLike
Did classes also do fire drills when you were teaching? Those were also fun for students.
LikeLike
Fire drills were a regular thing. There are laws (don’t know how well they’re followed) about how many you need to have per year. One thing that happened later in my career was the need to have lockdown drills. How sad that we even have to think of something like that! The reality is it is quite easy to walk onto most campuses without even being seen. Occasionally, the police would be in pursuit of someone in the area, and we would go into lockdown. That meant keeping our doors locked and the curtains shut, not knowing how long it might last. Eventually, kids need to use the bathroom—plenty of issues.
I always took part in the duck and cover exercises. I thought that I should also model this and take it seriously. The kids found it hilarious that their overweight teacher was trying to squeeze under some tiny desk.😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha! I’m sure trying to get adults under those tiny desks would be pretty funny. Thank God no cell phone videos from those days. 🤣 Lockdown drills are the duck and cover for the current generation of students. Duck and cover was always just a drill. Lockdowns have been used for way too many real emergencies. I hope they become ancient history at some point like duck and cover drills.
LikeLike
It was a sad site to see when we visited Hiroshima a couple of years ago.
LikeLiked by 1 person
People in the US practiced for Hiroshima events in towns big and small. It was almost not if but when.
LikeLiked by 1 person