Drug manufacturers seem to be making great progress in the search for an effective vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 disease. Phase 2 studies are reporting vaccine candidates are 90% to 95% effective in preventing infections. Assuming no major problems arise in manufacturing, the remaining major issues for protecting the population are distribution and allocation of doses.
I’ve heard news reports about who should receive a vaccine first but haven’t read anything listing an order. The consensus seems to be that medical personnel and first responders to be vaccinated first. That seems right. This group has the most exposure to those who are infected and could be a source of spread. They also deserve protection because they are the only ones who posses the skills to treat people who get sick.
While there are no doubt well-thought through plans on the order in which the vaccine should be made available to various groups of people, as a layman, I thought it would be interesting to try to identify the groups I thought should get priority and to hear the thoughts of readers, too.

My “Off The Top of the Head” List
- Medical personnel/first responders. I’ve heard that current plans are for medical personnel and first responders to be vaccinated first. That seems right. This group has the most exposure to those who are infected and could be a source of spread to vulnerable groups if they become infected. They also deserve protection because they are the only ones who posses the skills to treat people who get sick.
- Elderly patients in nursing homes. They are some of the most vulnerable and it has been months since many of them have been able to have in person contact with family.
- Seniors with pre-existing conditions. These people are another group particularly susceptible to serious illness from an infection. I’d suggest an arbitrary eligibility for this group is age 65 or older.
- Essential workers who deal with the public. This group includes people like bus drivers, teachers, and restaurant workers, customer facing airline and hotel employees among others.
- People with preexisting conditions not covered above.
- Everyone else.
(I think I should be congratulated for not giving in to my urge to put travel-starved bloggers at the top of the list.) 😊
There could be special exceptions. For example, should athletes get special treatment? Professional and amateur sports could return to normal schedules if athletes and support staff are presumed to be immune to the disease. But sports programs especially professional leagues like the NFL, NBA and NHL have the funds and organizational discipline to remain safe without a vaccine. It would be harder for colleges and other amateur athletes to remain safe without a vaccine.

Speaking of colleges. Does it make sense to make it a priority to vaccinate college students because they may be prone to spread the virus?
Allocating Coronavirus Vaccines Among Countries
When vaccines are available, they will be in high demand everywhere. Countries that invested in the development of a vaccine will have a good argument that they should be at the top of the list for its distribution. That may have even be a condition of providing the support. Some buyers may be willing to pay a high price. Companies will be tempted to sell to them first unless governments prevent it.
On the other hand, the fairest way might be to distribute vaccines first to whichever countries need it the most. Ironically, those countries would likely be the countries in North America and Europe where the virus is currently running rampant. But spread may be out of control in those countries solely because they didn’t bite the bullet and take the appropriate steps that other countries did.
Final Thoughts
Once someone is vaccinated, it would be nice if they were entered into a database and received a card or certificate showing that they have had the shots. That database or verification document could qualify the holders to travel freely domestically and internationally. It would seem appropriate, though that those who have been vaccinated should still comply with all or most other restrictions applicable to the general public.
On what basis would you allocate vaccine doses? Which groups should get priority in your view? Thanks for your thoughts. Let’s all stay safe for a few more months until vaccines are available.
High-risk people and children should be prioritized, if they want to be vaccinated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I definitely agree with high risk going first. If reports that children are very unlikely to get sick are correct, I might put them down the list. Politicians, movie stars, and athletes unless they are in a high-risk group, should not get priority. I don’t buy the notion that they should go first to instill confidence in the vaccines. Thanks for weighing in with your thoughts on this question.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s the breakdown for Ireland.
https://www.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/revealed-irelands-priority-list-for-covid-19-vaccine-and-who-will-get-jab-first-39840519.html
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing Ireland’s plans. Its order for distributing vaccines is similar to the U.S. and should serve the people of Ireland well.
LikeLike
I doubt very much that the little people will get vaccinated. We’re not on the list.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope everyone gets the chance to take a vaccine. It is the best chance at starting to get back to normal.
LikeLike
1. Medical workers (doctors, nurses, EMT, firemen, ambulance drivers, nursing home staff) 2. Delivery people (Amazon, FedEx, UPS, USPS, all the folks who come to your door) 3. Teachers, childcare workers, the folks taking care of our kids, college professors 4. Airport staff (TSA, counter people, food court people) 5. Airline flying staff 6. Bus drivers, train conductors 7. Grocery store staff (checkers, packers, etc.) 8. Restaurant staff, waiters, cooks, hosts, bartenders 9. Nursing home occupants 10. Anyone over 80 11. Anyone with preexisting conditions 12. Now it’s starting to be my turn…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for your thoughtful comment! I like your list. I’d put nursing home residents higher on the list because they have been locked down for months and have had no in-person visits.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think your list is pretty accurate. I just hope the coronavirus vaccine is effective and there are no severe side effects. Most vaccines take much longer to develop than the coronavirus vaccine is taking and that makes me feel a bit uneasy about its safety and efficiency.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You raise important issues that affect public acceptance of coronavirus vaccines. It would be helpful if we knew more about why coronavirus vaccines could be developed so quickly. Is it safer to get a vaccine or not get one. We’ll have to make those choices.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you most definitely:) but I also wonder if it’s going to be in effect to if you don’t get injected you won’t be able to go to work ,and that’s definitely troubling for those who don’t feel comfortable to take it , or in a way feel even though they are not being told they have to take it, but if they don’t they will not be able to gain a paycheck. . I hope it will not come to that, but needless to say I appreciate your response and I agree I will never judge anyone for not taking it or taking it it is up to each person . I suppose however this plays out, but the future of how this impect’s Society I think will be a life-changing one on a whole other level. Thank you again for the write-up I think it is informational and a very good read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even at 95% effective that means 5% ineffective, so a vaccine won’t solve all problems. Thanks for your thoughtful comments!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good write-up. In all honesty I have somewhat pondered this and wondered about the consequences of this vaccine because it hasn’t been around long enough to know if any ill course of action would take place because of this particular vaccine. I’m not trying to be negative but trying to think clearly with logic that when something has not been around for a long time to know the effects, nor a long study to really be done it can be somewhat troubling to think the fact that tons of people are going to be injected with something that has not been around long enough or studied to see what the effects could be down the road. Just some food for thought. Those are just my thoughts , not that anyone has to listen or agree just thought I would comment. Very good article and I appreciate you posting this it is a good topic to bring up at this time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The studies that determined efficacy also determined that serious side effects were not found. That doesn’t mean there can’t be any safety issues when the vaccine is administered to tens of millions rather than tens of thousands. So, you’re right. These vaccines aren’t risk free. For me, at this point, the risk is worth being able to return to a normal life. But that is a decision each person must evaluate for themselves.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with your list – it has been especially hard on the elderly in nursing homes that have been so isolated. My grandma is 93 and lives in a nursing home in Michigan, and they are locked down in their rooms until December unable to spend Thanksgiving with their families. I know it is for their safety, but still tough for them
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve had parents and other relatives in nursing homes before the pandemic. I know how hard it would’ve been on them and us not to be able to see them. I hope your grandma is doing as well as possible and that she and other residents are able to be freed from their lockdowns soon! Be safe and well this Thanksgiving.
LikeLike
So, I take it that the travel-starved are at the bottom, eh? No fair – let’s protest! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha! Us travel-starved bloggers never get any respect. No respect at all. (I wish I had a good Rodney Dangerfield punchline to follow that set up) 🤣
LikeLike
ya mean sorta like… I get no respect, the other day I asked my friend to take me for a ride – so, he drove me to the woods and left me there?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or even… I played hide and seek…they wouldn’t even look for me. He had a million of ’em.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He sure did. He was ‘King of the One-liners’ and that was no joke!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You got that right!
LikeLiked by 1 person
i am definitely a travel-starved blogger. But also, I am an essential worker, so i guess its win-win!
LikeLiked by 2 people
We just have to hold on for a few months more.
LikeLike
I’ve given this topic some thought recently, and your list and mine would be a near match.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I forgot to say politicians should be last!
LikeLiked by 3 people
♡ 😂🤣😅😆😁😄😃😀🙂
…♡♡♡…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Republicans and Tories and all those who lied to us and minimized the risk should be last. (I think we still have a lot to learn about this virus and staying safe. Masks will be with us for quite a bit longer .)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with you on putting those who minimized the pandemic at the back of the line! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hard to argue against the logic of your list.
LikeLiked by 3 people
It will be interesting to see the experts’ list.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed
LikeLiked by 2 people
Here in the UK our list of who would get it was apparently ‘leaked’ to the press;
“As things stand, the priority list for a coronavirus vaccine is:
Care homes residents and staff
Anyone aged 80 and over, and health and social care workers
Anyone aged 75 and over
Anyone aged 70 and over
Anyone aged 65 and over
High-risk adults under 65
Moderate-risk adults under 65
Anyone aged 60 years and over
Anyone aged 55 and over
Anyone aged 50 and over
Rest of the population”
I agree travel starved people should be number one of course 😉 but as an NHS worker I would be second on the list. A little nervous I must say!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Makes sense to get a vaccine to high risk groups first. But interesting there is no differentiation by occupational groups except health and social workers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree – you would think all human contact professions would be seen as somewhat of a priority
LikeLiked by 2 people
♡ It’s ALL about Making Money EveryOne; sure The Airlines ARE ‘Losing’ Money but still laughing ALL The Way to The Bank with Domestic Flights and Flights To NoWhere while the Pharma is Greedily Rubbing Their Hands at The Prospect of $500+ “vaccines” from The Pockets of The Scared, Intimidated and, Frankly, the Collaborators who just want Their Lives Back when it’s Gone
…♡♡♡…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Airlines are telling Congress they need another bailout so they can distribute vaccines. What a joke.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here is my order:
1. Medical workers (doctors, nurses, EMT, firemen, ambulance drivers, nursing home staff)
2. Delivery people (Amazon, FedEx, UPS, USPS, all the folks who come to your door)
3. Teachers, childcare workers, the folks taking care of our kids, college professors
4. Airport staff (TSA, counter people, food court people)
5. Airline flying staff
6. Bus drivers, train conductors
7. Grocery store staff (checkers, packers, etc.)
8. Restaurant staff, waiters, cooks, hosts, bartenders
9. Nursing home occupants
10. Anyone over 80
11. Anyone with preexisting conditions
12. Now it’s starting to be my turn…..
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s a great list. I put myself in the 65 and older group. 😊 No special consideration for athletes?
LikeLike