This is a follow up to my post on December 18, 2020, about a man who became unconscious on United Airlines Flight 591 from Orlando, FL to Los Angeles, CA on December 14. Several passengers attempted to aid the man by performing CPR for nearly one hour until the plane made an emergency landing in New Orleans, LA. The man was dead on arrival at the hospital. The cause of death was Covid-19.

TMZ reports that Tony Aldapa and Steven Chang each received phone calls and emails from United thanking them for their actions, apologizing “for the inconvenience you experienced on your recent trip,” and stating that each would receive vouchers worth $200 towards travel on United. A $200 travel voucher is not much but it is better than nothing, which is what all the other passengers got. What is worse in my view is even though United had reason to believe the man suffered from Covid-19, it continued the flight on the same airplane without cleaning, and after his cause of death was known, it did not tell the good Samaritans or any of the other passengers that they were exposed to coronavirus.
In the US, airlines and health authorities are under no obligation to tell passengers when they may have been exposed to some one carrying the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It shouldn’t be too much to ask that public health authorities or airlines contact individuals when they could have been exposed to the virus on commercial airliners. The Government of Canada at least maintains a website that passengers can check to see if they may have been exposed to coronavirus when traveling by airplane, cruise ship, or train.
The website matches information from provincial and territorial health authorities, international health authorities, and public websites with flight manifests to identify flights where passengers may have been exposed. New information is added daily and information older than 14 days is removed. For airplanes, the website lists the airline, flight number, date, origin, destination, and affected rows (three rows in front or back of a passenger who is confirmed to have Covid-19 and traveled during a period when they may have been infectious) if available.
This is a sample from January 19, 2021, of the information Canada makes available.
Airline | Flight number | Departing | Destination | Flight date [yyyy-mm-dd] | Affected rows |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AeroMexico | AM694 | Mexico City (MEX) | Vancouver (YVR) | 2021-01-05 | 5 to 21 |
AeroMexico | AM696 | Mexico City (MEX) | Vancouver (YVR) | 2021-01-05 | Unknown |
AeroMexico | AM696 | Mexico City (MEX) | Vancouver (YVR) | 2021-01-06 | Unknown |
AeroMexico | AM696 | Mexico City (MEX) | Vancouver (YVR) | 2021-01-08 | 25 to 30 |
AeroMexico | AM696 | Mexico City (MEX) | Vancouver (YVR) | 2021-01-09 | Unknown |
AeroMexico | AM636 | Mexico City (MEX) | Montreal (YUL) | 2021-01-11 | 22 to 28 |
Air Canada | AC567 | San Francisco (SFO) | Vancouver (YVR) | 2021-01-05 | 12 to 16 |
Air Canada | AC42 | Toronto (YYZ) | Delhi (DEL) | 2021-01-05 | 50 to 54 |
Air Canada | AC873 | Frankfurt (FRA) | Toronto (YYZ) | 2021-01-05 | 34 to 40 |
Air Canada | AC58 | Toronto (YYZ) | Doha (DOH) | 2021-01-05 | 41 to 46 |
The report on January 19 lists nearly 200 flights to or within Canada in the last 14 days, including many from the US, with known potential exposure. While studies have so far suggested that transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on planes is rare, it happens. Sharing this information may make passengers more willing to fly. If I flew, I would appreciate being able to know if there was potential exposure on the plane in order to protect those I might come in contact with.
Final Thoughts
The Biden Administration promises to be more proactive than the previous one in confronting the challenges of the coronavirus pandemic. Biden has already announced plans to vacate an executive order issued on January 18, 2021, that would have lifted  restrictions imposed early last year that bar nearly all non-U.S. citizens who within the last 14 days have been in Brazil, the United Kingdom, Ireland and the 26 countries of the Schengen area in Europe.
Having a system like Canada’s so travelers could know if there was onboard potential exposure could give some more confidence in air travel and the systems designed to maintain safety. Such a system could be very helpful for international travel where the US doesn’t require quarantine for arriving passengers.
On the other hand, among other issues, the airlines may object because publicizing the many instances where people are flying while being infectious undermines their contention that commercial jets present little risk of contracting coronavirus.
Do you think it would be helpful to be able to know if passengers on your flight may have been capable of spreading SARS-CoV-2. Is that something the airline or public health agencies should be required to disclose to passengers?
This is quite the shock to be honest. I’m surprised that an airline would act this way and not face repercussions…
The proper thing to do is to inform affected passengers to self isolate at least that’s what’s done in many countries. Sheesh!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those countries didn’t have a president who said Covid was a hoax.
LikeLike
if there is ONE person on a plane with Covid-19 here everyone on the plane will be notified and isolated for 14 days and have to get tested straight away and again at day 11. That’s here though. i am, to say the least, shocked at this story.
Oh and those in contact with people on the plane would need to get tested and isolate at least until results are received
LikeLiked by 1 person
The US unfortunately spent 2020 playing down the risks of Covid-19 and never established the infrastructure necessary to handle a process like you describe. Congress is more interested in passing liability waivers for businesses than encouraging or forcing them through regulation to do the right thing as far as responsibility to employees and customers.
LikeLike
Wow..that would be a disaster not knowing you would be exposed Covid on that flight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
United was not required to tell passengers about exposure to Covid, so it was an easy decision to say nothing. Also continuing the flight on the same plane without any cleaning is unconscionable in my view.
LikeLike
This rubs me the wrong way. In effect the airline is saying, “Thank you for risking your life, please enjoy this gift certificate.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
United didn’t even have the courtesy to tell them or the other passengers they could have been exposed to a deadly virus!
LikeLike
Nothing more soulless than trying spending an hour trying to keep someone alive and being told ‘sorry for the inconvenience’ it’s a strange choice of words
LikeLiked by 1 person
Airlines have a lot of practice trying to put lipstick on a pig.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This whole situation is terrible! And I can’t believe they only got $200! Wow!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very typical of United Airlines. Giving a travel voucher kind of adds insult to injury because using them requires flying United again.
LikeLike