SE Aeronautics, a sustainable aviation technology company based in Birmingham, AL, has proposed a super-efficient, mid-market airliner concept, the SE200, that can carry up to 264 passengers with a range of 10,500 miles (16,900 km).
The twin-engine design is a composite monocoque molded wide-body airliner that promises significant advantages over current airliners including faster cruising speed, reductions in fuel consumption of 70% and CO2 emissions of 80%, and the ability to operate from airports with short runways.
These are the SE200 specifications published on the SE Aeronautics website:
The SE200 sounds like a breakthrough. A potential drawback to the design that I see is that all fuel is stored in a bladder located above the fuselage because of the super-thin, high-lift wings. If the bladder ruptures during a crash, the passenger compartment will be bathed in flammable jet fuel. That problem must be solved, if it hasn’t been already, before safety regulators approve the design for passenger travel.

If the SE200 short-field landing performance is as impressive as its stated takeoff performance — it needs only 1,500 feet (about 457 meters) for takeoff — potentially it opens small airfields that are more convenient for passengers like London City Airport to long-haul, wide-body flights.
Final Thoughts
The SE200 is very promising aircraft. I have not seen technical reviews of its capabilities or comparisons to current aircraft and SE aeronautics has not identified the engine it proposes to use on this aircraft. Competing with Boeing, Airbus, and a growing list of companies seeking to enter the market for commercial airliners won’t be easy even if SE Aeronautics overcomes any technical or safety issues. Although this post makes no predictions as to future stock price, one item that looks promising for the company is the stock price has more than doubled in the last year. I hope the concept proves feasible as the potential reductions in costs and emissions could be substantial.
What a stunning picture!
LikeLiked by 1 person
its great to know that things like this are being worked on. the results are impressive but as you say, the fuel storage is a definite issue, or at least sounds that way from this layperson!
LikeLiked by 1 person
SE Aeronautics must have some answer for the fuel storage issue but I don’t know what it is. The website touts the safety of the design referring to the monocoque composite fuselage that it says won’t break apart as easily.
LikeLike
This SE200 sounds quite promising. Time will tell the project feasability.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. Now we wait to see if it really works. How do you think the SE200 looks from an esthetics or fashion point of view?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It definitely looks really sleek and stylish. A state of the art plane, very beautiful, classy and elegant.
LikeLike
If it looks good to you with your sense of style, SE Aeronautics should be happy. 😄
LikeLiked by 1 person
😄 😄 I guess style applies to many fields apart from fashion and beauty.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Airplanes being one of them. Thanks Blanca. 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope this proves to be a viable aircraft, not only for the benefits it provides from an aircraft perspective, but also adding more competition to the aircraft industry…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope so too. The SE200 might be a game changer for the aircraft industry and commercial aviation. I believe SE Aeronautics has applied for a patent on the design. We’ll see how that turns out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll count on you to keep me informed…
by the way, I thought you might be interested in this startup company founded by two Villanova students, one of whom I taught and is still a student. the other one graduated. You may understand it better than I do:
https://aerotrax.org/
LikeLiked by 1 person
It looks like they have software that helps airlines manage their maintenance records. All I know about that is your students can probably make a lot of money if their system works. Great entrepreneurial spirit and if they listened to you, they can even keep proper track of the dough they will rake in.
LikeLike
Whether it’s a bi-plane or a tri-plane, the use of more than one pair of wings is fascinating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They call it a tri-wing design. It would be fascinating to know more about why this configuration is better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m thinking shorter lift-off requirements, much like the old Fokker tri-planes but with none of the weaknesses due to Fokker’s vertical stacking of wings. The extra lift seems to be the aim. The horizontal configuration of three pairs offers far more stability and maneuverability over the unwieldy triplane configuration found of the Red Baron’s plane. I’m just guessing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only needing 1500 feet for take off is not much more than single-engine private aircraft. I wonder what drawbacks the tri-wing arrangement might have other than fuel storage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It looks very elegant. Female version of an aeroplain😅
LikeLiked by 1 person
The tri-wing, V-tail design is very elegant and striking. I hope the plane behaves more predictably that many females. Just joking!!! 😄
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol. You are funny yes!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You try first and report back. I’m a chicken. 🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
If it ever gets built 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Details, details… 🤣🤣🤣🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
i will see you onboard when it takes to the skies.😄😃
LikeLike